Writing is driven by the Muse, the source of the writer's inspiration. From the flash of the idea to the completed text, it runs like a river freely flowing, bound only by the constraints it has placed on itself.
What is written may be edited, re-written or tossed out altogether, but that is a different matter. One writes because one has something to say. And to say it well, one writes and re-writes a number of times. One is not writing to an audience or has a reader in mind. One writes for one's own satisfaction, for one's fulfilment. It is an expression of oneself in myriad ways. And one hopes that it will also interest others sufficiently to read through what one has written.
In a script for a movie, on the other hand, the compulsion is different. The script writer focuses on the audience; rather, he knows his audience and what they expect from the script. The script writer puts in effort to create the effect that the script produces. It is intentionally done, carefully planned and executed with skill.
The novel or the short story are not intended to address a specific audience, nor is it is designed and crafted for any purpose. An artist draws a picture because s/he sees the world in a certain way. It is his or her own personal expression. It has no critique or the viewer in mind. It is there because someone pictured it that way and gave expression to it. The same to my mind is true for the author.
To apply the techniques or the craft of movie-making to writing a novel or a short story is to defeat the very purpose of the Muse, who is hovering over the writer in mysterious ways. The techniques of the screenplay work for the movie, since movie-making is a craft and not an art at all, in my opinion.
Perhaps this is the reason that most writers don't like to talk about the art of writing fiction, though there are many schools teaching it. It is perhaps more useful to discuss one's work in a school with other writers, and also discuss what similar works have been handled by the masters (not the technique, but the content).
Above all, I think writing comes from writing, lots of writing and reading, lots of reading.
There is the matter of the structure of story telling. Again, it is a matter of craft. Every artistic work has structure, no doubt. But to put it into repeatable patterns is to turn it into a craft. While craft might determine success, it cramps the writer into a stylistic straitjacket and may fail to fulfil his basic need: to flow with the Muse.
I feel I need both Muse and the design patterns. Muse to make the text a living thing and design patterns to make it readable. If I don't follow the Muse my text will be hollow, mechanical and superficial. If I don't follow the design patterns, I will most likely be prisoned inside my own mind unable to reach another human being.
ReplyDelete